Fayyis Oromia*
As far as my hitherto understanding of our history is concerned,
Oromia (Ethiopia), as also depicted in the Holy Book, is Cushland, which is located south of Egypt and now stretches from Meroe to Mombasa. I know that there is a controversy regarding this assertion for some scholars do claim that the Biblical Cush was located somewhere in Arabia. But, let me here take as a fact (operationally define) that Cushland is the land of those nations speaking Cushitic languages, i.e. the land which stretches in Africa from northeastern Sudan to southeastern Kenya. Then, we can see that current geographical
Oromia is only part of this Cushland. We heard and read that Cushitic nations existed in eastern part of Africa, all sharing a common cultural heritage, since 8000 years ago. As linguistic evidences testify, the ancient Cushitic languages had been divided into four branches starting from 5,000 B.C., thus now the branches having their different linguistic and national identities. Some common positive values of the Cushites included their monotheistic faith system, in which they did believe in only one Supreme Being known as
Waaqa by the Oromo, the faith system with no concept for Satan and Hell in order to punish a human being after death; their egalitarian social norm and democratic values like the
Gadaa administration of the Oromo; their tendency to cultivate harmony, love and peace as major social values; as well as their good
tradition regarding peaceful transfer of power as practiced in the Gadaa democracy. But, as recorded in historical process of the region, Cush peoples in the northern part of Oromia (like the Agew) had already started to accept language, aristocratic rule, theocratic tradition and other values of the Middle East, including personal namings in both their aristocracy and theocracy. NB: Oromia = formerly Ethiopia, as defined here:http://finfinnetribune.com/Gadaa/2014/12/fayyis-oromia-why-not-the-union-state-of-oromia-as-an-optimal-solution-for-the-majority-at-the-center/, is a union in which the following five points (FADOB-score) will be implemented: F = Freedom from the system of domination; A = Afan Oromo as a primary language of the union; D = Democracy as the rule of the game in the union; O = Oromia instead of Ethiopia as the name of the union; and B = Black-red-white as the Cushitic flag of the union!
|
“coming together is the beginning, keeping together is a progress and working together is a success.” |
Before the beginning of the domination by the Axum empire (in today’s Tigrai and Eritrea), inhabitants of the area were believed to be mostly Cushites; that is why also the Axum civilization is said to be part of the Cush civilization. The so called Solomonic dynasty in the Axum empire is actually taken by some scholars as the dynasty of the Agew, who accepted values of aristocracy and theocracy, including the creation of Ge-ez language (a combination of Agew, original Hebrew and ancient Yemenite Hebrew languages). This dynasty was believed to have been later taken over by the explicit Cushitic dynasty of the Zagwe. The same trend seems to have had happened latter in Hankoo-bar of Dirree-Saawwaa (Shoa), where the Cushitic Oromo used to live. Also the Solomonic dynasties in Saawwaa and Gondar were considered by some writers as the dynasties of these native Oromos. The ruling class of this dynasty created its own language – “Lisane-Nigus” (Amharinya), around the year 1270 from the combination of Afan Oromo, Ge-ez/Tigrinya and Agewinya. The Chrisitian kingdom is said to have controlled only about 1000SqKm around Hankoo-bar in the 14th century, being surrounded by the Oromo, but it gradually expanded its territory to include all the present Amhara part of North Saawwaa and beyond that extended up to the Indian Ocean. In the 16th century, after the Oromo defense forces successfully protected their nation from attacks by both the Ottoman Turks and the Portuguese (time when all the foreigners were driven out and since when Oromia was considered to be isolated), this same Oromo dynasty continued to rule in Gondar till the rise of the warlord Atse Theodros, who started to defeat the Oromo dynasty for the first time, being supported by the Europeans. The negative impacts of the northern elites’ rule on the affected part of the Cush nations did include the forceful conversion of peoples to Judaism and Orthodox-Christianity; authoritarian tradition terrorizing the non-Abyssinian neighbors; autocracy and dictatorship replacing their democratic tradition; intrigues as well as inculcating of war as their motto for keeping power; and taking over of power from each other by using means of murder and violence. These negative impacts were to some extent checked by the Oromo till the rise of Atse Theodros in the mid-nineteenth century. The first victim of the Abyssinian domination was the Cushitic Agew nation; it was then followed by the victimization of the Oromo in the northern part of Oromo region. Some history writers think that Cush peoples were physically pushed from the north to the south, but I think they were rather more influenced, both culturally and linguistically, than only being pushed physically. The military and political moves of Theodros and Yohannes IV as well as that of Minilik and Haile-Sillasie were then the further attempts of subjugating the Oromo and the other nations in the southern part of Oromia. At last, Minilik and Gobanaa together succeeded in invading the Oromo and other Cushitic and Nilotic nations of the southern region.
When we look at the recent history of the Oromo, this nation can be regarded as part and parcel of both the dominating polity and the dominated public in history of the existing Oromia. The kings from Ye-Kunoo-Amlak to Haile-Sillasie Guddisa, most of them originating from Saawwaa Oromo, were the classical examples. The move of the Oromo in self-defense against both the Europeans and the Ottoman Turks during the sixteenth century war in the Horn, including the rule by Oromo kings in Gondar dynasty; the ruling Oromo federalists of Ejjuu Oromo from Ras Ali-I to Ras Ali-II during the so called “Zemene Mesafint” (Era of the Princes); the contribution of Tewabech (daughter of Ras Ali-II from Oromo origin), the wife of AtseTheodros, for the success of her husband; the contribution of Itege Taayitu Bitul (the Ejjuu Oromo lady) in coordinating the moves of both Minilik and Gobanaa during invasion of the Oromo region and during the Adwa war against Italian colonizers; the contribution of Oromo Generals in consolidating “Oromian unity” and the mysterious death of Gobanaa; the rejection of Lij Iyassu (a Muslim Oromo) by the European Christian Kings and his premature death being accused as a Muslim; the role of the Oromo Generals like Qusee Dinagde to consolidate Haile-Sillasie’s rule; the role of Oromo Generals like Jagamaa Keello in defending Haile-Sillasie from the coup attempt by the Neway brothers; the participation of the other Oromo Generals like Tsigee Dibuu in this same coup attempt; the role of Oromo patriots like Abune Phexros, Abebe Aregay and Belay Zeleqe in defendingOromia from the fascist Italy during the Second World War; the heroic deeds of Abdissa Aaga in Italy; the role of Oromo revolutionaries like Walellign Mekonen, Haile Fida, Baaroo Tumsa, Senay Likke, Dabalaa Dhinsaa, Mengistu Haile-Mariam and Teferi Bantii to topple the last monarchy; the coup attempt by the Oromo Generals like Merid Nugusee, Demise Bulto and Amha Desta against the brutal Derg; the “last minute” attempt of General Tesfaye Gebre-Kidan and Tesfaye Dinqaa (both being Oromo) to save Oromia from disintegration during the fall of Derg; the role of OLF in bringing down the Derg rule; the main opposition against Woyane since 1991, which is mainly from the Oromo nation; and even the fact that the prominent unitarist leaders in the present opposition camp, being from Oromo roots, etc – all these do show the involvement of Oromo elites in both the northern elites’ domination process and in the defense of the oppressed nations against this same process.
Today, the domination process is going on under the influence of the tyrant Woyane regime. We know that some of the oppressed nations in the present geographical area of Oromia have developed their own distinctive languages, identities and ways of life to deserve their own free nation-states. Their amalgamation within a unitary state by disregarding their right to national self-determination was not, is not and will not be, as such constructive. Just disregarding the possible unitary state advocated by the northern elites, it is interesting that we can now observe, for example, the Oromo people are the most tolerant in the region and allow “others” to live among them in comparison to nations in the north. Let’s look at the relatively very few presence of the Gurage, who tend to move to all corners of the country for the sake of making business, in the northern region, in comparison to what they do enjoy all over Oromo region and in southern regions. It is this tolerance of the Oromo, which invites these “others” to work with the Oromo people against all the injustices now taking place in the whole Oromia. The ongoing resistance against the current tyranny, which is perpetrated by the rulers of the northern elites from Tigrai, needs such an all-inclusive alliance in a form of both the liberation struggle and the democratization process. Here we need to see the importance of the “two against one” phenomenon, especially in the triangular struggle of Amhara elites, Tegaru elites and Oromo elites for either domination or liberation of their respective nation. To make this phenomenon of freedom practical, the Oromo liberation forces, in our policy, should consider to liberate, not only the Oromo people, but also all oppressed nations in the country – which are still the victims of the negative impacts of the northern domination process. Our move in the future should be liberation move from the status quo of tyranny — through a genuine federation (national autonomy for each nation) — and through national freedom (independence of each nation-state) — towards confederation (union of free nations) in the Horn. Surely again, it is the Oromo liberation movement which can be the main factor for the coming demise of the current Tigrean tyrannical regime, that is why the present regime is more brutal on the Oromo. The northern rulers should be compelled to move toward this concept of the confederation, and they should stop the ongoing subjugation of the oppressed peoples under their rule.
Thus, the self-determination of all oppressed nations in the country must be part of the Oromo liberation movement, which wants to foster a new Cushitic Oromia, even though there are some minor non-Cushitic nations also living in the area. Such renaissance of the Cush nations in the region must be the true Oromian renaissance in contrast to the further northern domination going on under the rule of the TPLF; Oromian renaissance is now wrongly described to be the same as a further northern domination like what is going on now. The genuine Oromian renaissance is the reversing of the negative northern domination. The liberation of oppressed nations from this negative impact should be accompanied by the necessary liberation movement. In this regard, especially during the last one and half century, there was the struggle between the elites of the two northern nations (the Amhara and Tegaru elites) and others, including the Oromo, either for domination or for liberation. Except the short break during the rule by the Tigrai warlord Atse Yohannes IV, the elites from the Amhara nation (including the Amharanized Oromo) dominated for more than a century. But the elites of all dominated nations, specially those of the Oromo and the Tegaru, fought together against this Amhara elites’ domination. The feasible approach in the liberation struggle was and still is the optimal use of this “triangular struggle” in Oromia. Here, the fact that at least three forces (Amhara, Tegaru and Oromo) are fighting against each other for either domination or liberation is unique. Such triangular struggle needs a wisdom in knowing and using the possible alliances of the “two against one.” Till 1991, there had been no confusion; the Oromo liberation forces and the Tigrean “liberation” forces had formal or informal alliances against the dominating and ruling Amhara elites. From 1991 till 2006, there was a confusion for the Amhara opposition forces and the Oromo liberation forces could not trust each other to foster an alliance against the now dominating Tigrean elites. The Tigrean ruling elites successfully divided and polarized the Amhara patriotic forces and the Oromo liberation fronts; these two couldn’t foster an alliance of the “two against one.” One of the methods applied by the ruling Tigrean elites is acknowledging Amharinya as the only federal language and denying Afan Oromo the same status. With this manipulation, the Tigrean elites could make the Oromo feel as if we are still dominated by the Amhara elites and manipulated the Amhara elites to sense as if they are still the privileged ones in Oromia.